In fact checking, a critical need is prioritization. Focusing on the challenge of misinformation, how can fact checkers be supported in their decision making to decide which pieces of content may have more negative impacts in comparison to others?
Five major dimensions can help determine the potential urgency of a specific message or post: actionability, exploitativeness, likelihood of spread, believability, and social fragmentation. More about these dimensions can be found at: https://artt.cs.washington.edu/analysis-framework-online-misinformation-harm/
A longer version of the questionnaire with helpful hints for answering can be found at: https://artt.cs.washington.edu/online-misinfo-harms-questionnaire/